Institutionalising Policy Entrepreneurship in the Global South: The Case for a Policy and Strategy Incubation Centre in India

Authors

  • Dr. Harsh Thukral1, Dr. Rajat Sharma2, Devi Priya S3, Om Thapliyal4, Arav Mittal5, Simran Sarda6, Arya Sachdev7, Disha Vashishtha8, Satvik Kapoor9, and Sophia Vaz10 Author

Keywords:

policy labs; policy entrepreneurship; institutional complementarity; Global South; India; public-sector reform; policy incubation

Abstract

India’s policy and strategy ecosystem is largely formulated at the centre, with prototyping and implementation proceeding through multi-stakeholder participation across national, sectoral, and regional contexts, typically via pilot phases before pan-India scale-up. This paper examines the case for a Policy and Strategy Incubation Centre (PSIC), or similar centres focused on subsectors/subthemes, within India’s existing policy architecture as a government-anchored mechanism treating policy design as an iterative supportive mechanism and discipline, analogous to technology incubation. Drawing on comparative literature on public-sector innovation labs, including Denmark’s MindLab, the United Kingdom’s Nesta and Policy Lab, the Governance Lab (GovLab) at New York University, and Chile’s Laboratorio de Gobierno, the paper situates PSIC (or more) within the broader evolution of policy labs and adapts it to the Indian context. It proposes anchoring PSIC (or more) within an existing autonomous, multidisciplinary organisation, independent of any single Ministry or within a given ministerial framework, working closely with Ministries and industry, tasked with developing a credentialised cadre of policy entrepreneurs and strategy specialists (as part of cohorts) who contribute to research, identify needs, and carry ideas through the value chain of implementation and engage in guided assignments for ministries or corporates as part of the evolution. PSIC is also envisaged to catalyse think-tanks and enterprises that coordinate with existing institutions, thereby complementing India’s innovation infrastructure, such as the central planning supporting organisation, NITI Aayog. Beyond this administrative rationale, the paper frames PSIC in social and cultural terms and conceptualises it as a case of institutional innovation in the Global South.

Author Biography

  • Dr. Harsh Thukral1, Dr. Rajat Sharma2, Devi Priya S3, Om Thapliyal4, Arav Mittal5, Simran Sarda6, Arya Sachdev7, Disha Vashishtha8, Satvik Kapoor9, and Sophia Vaz10

    1Dr. Harsh Thukral – Dy. Director (Economic Service and Productivity Promotion Group) and Public Policy and Regional Development Initiative, National Productivity Council

    2Dr. Rajat Sharma – Director (Economic Service and Productivity Promotion Group), National Productivity Council

    3Devi Priya S – Doctoral Student, Public Policy and Management Area, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta

    4Om Thapliyal – Masters in Public Policy, OP Jindal Global University

    5Arav Mittal – BBA Computational Business Analytics, Mahindra University

    6Simran Sarda – B.A. (Hons) Economics, Christ University

    7Arya Sachdev – B.A. (Hons) Economics, Christ University

    8Disha Vashishtha – BBA Finance and International Business, Christ University

    9Satvik Kapoor – BA LLB (Hons), National Law University at Lucknow

    10Sophia Vaz – BBA Finance and International Business, Christ University

References

Downloads

Published

2026-10-03